🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."