🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 stands as arguably the most deadly – and consequential – occasions during three decades of conflict in Northern Ireland.

Throughout the area where events unfolded – the memories of that fateful day are displayed on the buildings and seared in collective memory.

A public gathering was held on a chilly yet clear afternoon in the city.

The march was challenging the practice of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been put in place following an extended period of conflict.

Military personnel from the specialized division fatally wounded 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and continues to be, a strongly republican area.

One image became especially prominent.

Photographs showed a religious figure, Father Daly, using a bloodied white handkerchief in his effort to shield a crowd moving a youth, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Media personnel documented much footage on the day.

Documented accounts includes the priest telling a media representative that military personnel "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no justification for the gunfire.

The narrative of events was disputed by the original examination.

The Widgery Tribunal found the Army had been shot at first.

Throughout the negotiation period, the administration established another inquiry, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said the first investigation had been a cover-up.

In 2010, the report by Lord Saville said that generally, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the individuals had presented danger.

The contemporary head of state, David Cameron, apologised in the House of Commons – stating fatalities were "unjustified and inexcusable."

The police commenced look into the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as the defendant, was charged for homicide.

Accusations were made regarding the killings of one victim, 22, and twenty-six-year-old another victim.

Soldier F was additionally charged of seeking to harm multiple individuals, other civilians, more people, another person, and an unnamed civilian.

Exists a judicial decision maintaining the soldier's anonymity, which his attorneys have argued is required because he is at risk of attack.

He stated to the examination that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at individuals who were carrying weapons.

This assertion was disputed in the official findings.

Evidence from the inquiry would not be used straightforwardly as evidence in the criminal process.

During the trial, the accused was hidden from public behind a privacy screen.

He addressed the court for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a session in that month, to reply "innocent" when the charges were presented.

Family members of the deceased on Bloody Sunday journeyed from Londonderry to the courthouse daily of the proceedings.

A family member, whose relative was died, said they were aware that listening to the trial would be emotional.

"I visualize the events in my mind's eye," he said, as we walked around the key areas discussed in the proceedings – from the street, where his brother was killed, to the adjacent the courtyard, where the individual and the second person were died.

"It returns me to my location that day.

"I assisted with the victim and lay him in the ambulance.

"I relived each detail during the proceedings.

"Notwithstanding experiencing everything – it's still valuable for me."